Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HARA-KIRI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if it has reliable sources after shooting begins. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HARA-KIRI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film has not started shooting yet, which means it fails WP:NFILMS, and there are no sources provided to show WP:GNG notability. I can't find any sources (though it's a tricky subject to Google for - there have been several films with similar titles). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NFF and there is no prejudice to recreating this in the future should it prove to meet WP:GNG. Ubelowme (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that is happening, still less that it is notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete along with the problems already mentioned when you look at the edits of the the article creator Julesgladys (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) it looks like we may have a WP:COI and/or selfpromotion situation occurring. MarnetteD | Talk 22:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the poster child of TOOSOON. Lack of sources speaking toward the project make deletion a no-brainer. I might have suggested a redirect to the film's director, but his own article is soon to be speedied as an unverifiable BLP violation. As for a redirect to the article on the producer, Jules Gladys, it is itself weak enough to likely end up at AFD as well. No coverage + no verifiability = Non-notable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An identical version of the article called Hara-Kiri (2012 film) has been created. —Hue Sat Lum 17:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deleted, and the author warned. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Created again, speedy deleted again, author blocked for 24 hours. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.