Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambgoat
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:17, 31 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like a small site, insignificant outside it's small group of users. But feel free to correct me. 57.66.51.165 20:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This site is actually very important and should be left alone. (Unsigned comment by 216.197.136.14 (talk · contribs))
- Delete. Vanity page. What's more interesting is this thread on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the Atreyu article, as you can see from its edit history. And they're still at it. Nufy8 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. (Unsigned comment by 12.208.76.100 (talk · contribs))
- Delete nn website/forumcruft. --Etacar11 02:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This article should most definitly stay. As someone alreagy mentioned
lambgoat is an important site and highly relates to internet pop culture. Many people have heard of lambgoat yet have no clue what its all about and this article helps with that. It should stay just to inform the public what lambgoat in all its absurdity, is really about. ~A dude (Unsigned comment by 12.207.37.67 (talk · contribs))
- Delete Forumcruft. KevinGovaerts 14:12:20, 2005-08-05 (UTC)
TLNR
- Delete Wikipedia is not a web directory. Botsie 08:48, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn, WP is Not, and possibly protect deleted as it is likely to be recreated by anonymous fans. Usrnme h8er 11:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.