Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slog
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:15, 31 March 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 06:15, 31 March 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 22:41, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
neologism and dicdef. Delete.Ken
- "Neologism" isn't a reason to delete. Kappa 18:13, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Neologisms are considered a form of Original Research -Satori 18:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete neologism. Hamster Sandwich 19:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. One part neologism, one part copyvio dicdef. --Carnildo 23:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologisms are a classic valid reason to delete pages. Nandesuka 16:52, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.