Talk:The Weather Network

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Canada: Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Weather Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of historical screenshots be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

comment

I think we should make a new article for the list of past hosts. It is getting really long! 217.45.203.34 (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you PLEASE DISAMBIGUATE HOSTS, past and present when updating your lists??? Some of those links could start some urban legends!! Bacl-presby 17:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Twn07 02 12.jpg

Image:Twn07 02 12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Candice Ola.JPG

Image:Candice Ola.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale has been added. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LF 07.jpg

Image:LF 07.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Appeal

Does anybody have any sources, for this? Weather Network has recently, been employing attractive women, for ratings. GoodDay (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lol. Very funny. Not here though. - Since these on air 'depicters' largely cater to a pop culturist demographic who have minimal legitimately scientific background, it just feeds into their dumb binary narratives portrayal. The criticisms section vaguely addresses this prior to my observation. My additions to this section, and the history survey, just added more insight into the unethical nature of this corporation, whilst providing a couple of examples of stellar objective outlets as alternative choices for the wiser segment of the population; those be the -new- "hello weather" (Government of Canada), and Accuweather (largest multinational weather corporation by a country mile). My additions were present for almost 48 hours in the main online article! A little bit of 'time' per se to reeducate some of the public at least, about the juvenile nature of this station's broadcasting techniques aimed to -uneducating- the public. Sorry networkian culture. Of course I knew my inserts would be detected by some scoundrel-esque motivated watchdog at some point! Cheers. Now I see my previous insert has eluded eyes for weeks. Lots of time for readers of this talk page to see all the problems caused by these losers; and the more appropriate alternatives! See the c/net article about the hottest, driest era since the medieval times in the -west- of North America! c/net are yet another reputable outlet 'crushing' the utopian binarist ideology of Kimmy and Mr. Mei. Sorry losers; this whole section has been here for almost three months; re-educating the public. You lose. On second thought, I wonder if they've seen this page and are using it to -try- to guide their young, crony wannabees of their hyper-simplistic paradigmatic ideology? Wonders never cease eh? Good luck on that one. My ideas are far too esoteric for them. Nice try attempting to juxtapose 'temperature and dewpoint cohesiveness' ideas with 'color' onto a "wind gust" map. See bitches-- it doesn't work. Accuweather are laughing in your face, and getting prepared for the "3% RH fire season" in the Southwest US. We saw the Sahara Desert numbers of 2% this week as well! Anyways, no storm is as big as the "width of Canada." Your daftness is pathetic. The space probe slamming into the moon article was great, until you tried to use it again, 2 weeks later. No 'pair' of events like this happens back to back that quickly. Just trying to "reuse" another article to draw people in right jackasses? Every postmodern dirty trick in the book;- but it still --doesn't-- work. Heat domes are high pressure, atmospheric rivers are low pressure. They are NOT ONE OF THE SAME THING IDIOTS. Did you see that Antarctica depiction today? You =contradicted= yourselves in the worst possible way with the continuing lies jackasses. Keep it up and all the other reputable outlets will have even MORE reason to laugh in your faces. Real scientists shun "utopic binarist fantasy" children. But you know, young -Tyler- is actually a pretty ok guy... by networkian standards. He's more middle ideological spectrum than the extremists Kimmy and Mei. WOW.. did you see the minus 35 degrees Celsius =dewpoints= over the =Sahara Desert= today Kimmy? Mr. Mei? ONE PERCENT RH with 105 degree F temps!! Your utopian binarist fantasy =really took a hit today= didn't it though eh!!?? Two final things to be aware of with this disreputable corp.-- Audio/Visual 'dissonance,' and sneaky IT pop up boxes throughout the rest of the internet. It is wonderful to see "articles from other good sources" just =bypass= the pop up 'disruptions' from these idiots, and just continue along with their articles as if nothing even happened. The postmodern tricks are gradually losing their shock value children! Tough nugies, eh? Occasionally however, these morons will put their foot in their mouth... They said today on one of their offsite pop ups: "colder near Lake Ontario, but warmer double digits away, inland." Hah, did you just -admit- to warm continentality in the traditional sense, people??? Wooow, wonders never cease eh? Meteorology by itself, can never 'overtake' climatology and/or relativism. SCIENCE IS TOO COMPLEX SCUM. STOP TRYING. The CEO of accuweather himself who we spoke to last year, is scoffing at this general "networkian desperation," but now and then, the network will say something that in effect contradicts the rigid binarist poison that came into fruition around 2006 when Kimmy and Mei came into "power" so to speak. We used to think Chris Murphy sucked, but he's actually wised up and matured a bit in his old age! Imagine that; one of the core crony group actually "semi-defecting" if you want to call it that! That "axis of evil's" (2006-2020) hey day is waning somewhat too. Just keep in mind.... there are many =other= much more professional weather corps. out there to choose from! And AccuW? well, they're 25 to 30 times more influential! So are many good intelligent people! Were done. Now watch them remove this sex appeal section; or at least most of it. cheers.24.36.115.4 (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on The Weather Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]