Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LarryFlynt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:48, 4 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LarryFlynt}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


LarryFlynt

[edit]
  • Code letter: C, A, possibly E as well

These IPs and users are all disruptive single purpose accounts that have been revert warring over a made up definition of Hotbox for several weeks as well as causing other disruptions. LarryFlynt has been blocked because of his username with a soft block. Based on contributions, Buraisu (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki), who is presumably also 71.112.48.48 (talk+ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log)), has been blocked for 3RR, but is likely not the same person as these guys (my guess is that to the extent that there is more than one person here, they all are high school friends or something). --BigDT 15:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As a non-participant who requested 3RR block and warned various people involved, I almost did a RFCU. But since there's no big mainspace problem, and since it's plausible that these guys, did, as Buraisu suggests, all turn up here after a forum dispute, I decided to let it go unless there was more trouble. But were there socks I'd be happy with banning the extra accounts, as there hasn't been much in the way of useful contribution either. William Pietri 17:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Red X Unrelated --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 17:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.