User talk:Owunsch
Welcome
|
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hey
Hi, Owunsch.
I've noticed your contributions to the article Russian Apartment Bombings. While there's nothing wrong with them in my view, I could not help but notice that forming an opinion about something not really known is a great way to project one's Unconscious, and for precisely that reason users editing that particular article are likely to embrace some kind of a creative outlet in their real lives. What is creativity, after all, if not manifesting the Sun/the God who broke into pieces of artwork to illuminate the darkness within every human soul. I wholly appreciate your anonymity, but if you happen to have any sort of an online gallery of your works, I would love a chance to take a look, if it's not too much intrusive for you.
Best regards, Document hippo (talk) 10:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Document hippo:,
- Thanks for your message. I don't have any online gallery of artwork (I don't make much art these days), but thank you for asking.
- Owunsch (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Owunsch.
I would love to hear your explanations why do you believe that the type of the attack included a "Possible" false flag. What do you mean by "possible"? Am I supposed to toss a coin, or which procedure do you suggest to determine the answer to that question?
I adore your editing! I would enjoy to help you further improve the article.
Document hippo (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think the "possible false flag" phrasing reflects the content of the article as a whole, which explains that some scholars, journalists, and politicians believe that the Russian security services organized the attacks. Other people disagree, which is why "possible" makes sense as a qualification. Owunsch (talk) 18:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)