User talk:Elephantidae123/perchGroup
Peer Review: Ben Chance 1. Neutral content: I do not see any words or phrases that could be considered as bias so it is looking good.
2. Reliable sources: The source you are using in this draft looks reliable and is from a journal. It looks like you used this article for the Balkhash perch, but I am not sure what articles you used to find information about the European and yellow perch. Making that clear by citing these articles as well would make your edits even more reliable.
3. Clear structure: Is this draft well organized? Can you follow it easily? Yes, the draft is well organized. It is clear that you are focusing on the various species of perch, mainly focusing on European, Balkhash, and yellow perch species. It is easy to follow as the information on these species is organized into bullet points.
What pages will be edited? You proposed to edit the Perch page and potentially the European perch page explained in the top & bottom of your edits.
Who will do the editing/adding of what topics/ pages? Clear from the sandbox which proposed edits are Heather's vs which proposed edits are Odonnus'.
Does there seem to be an even distribution of contribution from all team members? Yes, glancing over Odunnus' proposed edits, there seems to be an equal contribution from both of you.
What sorts of contributions with regard to images are planned? You do not mention any plans to insert an image in your edits. Maybe you could potentially take a picture of your perch in lab to try and capture one of the characteristics/colors that you explained in your edits.
Do you see where this content might fit from the information provided? Meaning...can you see what part of an article and what page this will go in? Yes, you clearly state that you plan to focus on editing the species section of the perch article.
4. Integration: Does anything link up with something you or your team is working on? How can you help each other? I do not think that there is anything linking our group's edits together.
Do they link to other relevant pages in the text of their draft? Yes, you do a great job linking to other wiki articles.
5. General Edits This introduction was successful and the population of Balkhash perch in the Balkhash Lake is rarer now. This sentence seems contradictory, maybe replace the "and" with a "however"
Peer Review 2
Odonnus, Your draft clearly states your plan of action and changes you’ll be making for the wiki page in an organized fashion. I really like that you make each section distinct and go into depth for each one. The content feels neutral and the citations come from credible sources, all which have their own link to the references section, and you also make good use of other pages within your draft. I think it would definitely be beneficial to add this to the wiki page. JustinDelC (talk) 05:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)