Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Blu
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 12 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:30, 12 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SNOW Tone 11:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Young Blu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsigned artist that doesn't appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Wisdom89 (T / C) 07:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 08:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Doesn't appear to meet WP:RS and WP:MUSIC. South Bay (talk) 08:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Who is this guy? No coverage or albums of note. Should have been speedied. Rasputin72 (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Completely fails WP:MUSIC. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — No sources available and unsourced BLP. Gosox(55)(55) 19:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete should have been speedied, both as failing to claim notability and as clear advertising. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a note here: the article is clearly not speediable as it is obviously claiming some degree of recognition and popularity. That's enough to pass the assertion of importance test at CSD. Wisdom89 (T / C) 21:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can not find in-depth coverage for this rapper in reliable sources; does not appear to pass WP:MUSICBIO. Gongshow Talk 08:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:MUSICBIO; being mentioned in an up and coming blog is not sufficient. Cocytus [»talk«] 14:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.