Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formosa Triangle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:09, 14 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 04:09, 14 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Formosa Triangle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. The only source for this is Muhammad Isa Dawud, see [1] where you find (if that is accurate) a little bit about him. He evidently also claims there is a lot of Djinn activity at this place that no one else seems to know about [2]. dougweller (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Two articles in Google News, both about a different Formosa Triangle. Limited coverage (489 Ghits) in Google Web, most being about a different Formosa Triangle. The couple that are related to this article are blogs, forums, and other unreliable sources. 16 Google Books hits. Mostly about the China-Luzon-Formosa triangle. One Google Scholar hit; unable to verify. -Atmoz (talk)
- Delete Does not seem to be sufficiently notable. Gandalf61 (talk) 10:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete lack of reliable sources. Is there another name under which this might be found? - Eldereft (cont.) 15:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.