Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ndff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ndff

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Delete - I love how users go anonymous to remove prod tags with no explanation. Anyway, non-notable forumcruft. Wickethewok 08:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete this article. We're just trying to make a history of our forum because we want to remember major events.

Thank you. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky-Like (talk • contribs)

- While your intentions may be good, this is not the purpose the Wikipedia. WP is a place for articles about well known subjects and individuals. It is not intended to be used to chronicle the history of individual internet forums. Wickethewok 08:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't we be revolutionaries? ( :P ) I know it may seem silly, and I can see that, but--dispite the silly face I added-- there are people who are interested in this history and would appreciate it if it were let on. I'll make changes to it to meet whatever needs that must be met. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricky-Like (talk • contribs)

- Heheh, sorry, I'm not ready to take the leap in leading the WP revolution of forum articles. I don't think WP is quite what you're looking for to publish your forum's history. Wickethewok 08:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see. :( Well, in that case, do you have any suggestions on other sites that are as neat as WP? Thank you for explaining, too. I appreciate it. Ricky-Like

Delete Wikipedia is not a directory of web forums. Get your forum featured in a major newspaper or magazine first and you may deserve an article then. Kimchi.sg 08:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --mboverload 09:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:'(

Delete, yet another non-notable forum. JIP | Talk 09:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn forum, terrible article. Example sentence: "She was later banned for insulting a number of forumers with forumers OrgasmAddict and EatTheCurb." And people wonder why forum articles almost never get kept! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:09, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
hehelolol^-^kekela delete. RasputinAXP c 13:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Andrew. Fave sentence: "A moderator called and spoke with his dad, who punished him." Go dad! · rodii · 13:54, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn fancruft. -- Kicking222 14:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because who cares. Danny Lilithborne 21:19, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly. Fagstein 21:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.