Jump to content

Talk:Consumerism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mkevlar (talk | contribs) at 19:50, 15 April 2022 (history mess: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 March 2020 and 11 June 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Inboundspring.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 September 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Henny2shoes. Peer reviewers: Shenglintan, Jakemeisen81, JustinChiu1, Smithlilly3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 February 2019 and 31 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Samqtrmain. Peer reviewers: Samqtrmain.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

consumerism

how did the criticism piece come about? I thought that was very interesting.--SpencerWirtz (talk) 03:14, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


para. on Smulyan is problematic

The cited work -- Smulyan, Media in Everyday Life -- has no reference, and it cannot be found anywhere online. It may not exist, in which case, this part of the article perhaps should be dropped. More experienced Wikipedia editors should know what to do in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkarapin (talkcontribs) 15:18, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

history mess

Section is riddled with distracting/unnecessary notes. Reads like a know-it-all 4th grade english teacher marked it up. Weird flex. I propose deleting most of the notes, though some may serve as valid areas for improvement. Mihir.pethe1 (talk) 06:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article's content in other places likely has |ESL contributions or used computer translation to create content. Many places need a rewrite including the introduction TheKevlar (talk) 19:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160C