Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maya Nassar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Consensus is leaning keep, but not enough input was received to close the discussion as such. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Nassar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She has some coverage but is only known for winning a minor beauty pageant and her blog. Non notable Gbawden (talk) 12:42, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 12:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 12:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She is notable. Much of the press coverage she has received is in Arabic or French. If you search مایا نصار, you will see. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
Delete for now at best and restart when better, questionable signs of a solidly better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perfectly good and well sourced article of a person who enjoys regional notability as evidenced by coverage from foreign press (alyaqaza and NinaIraq). More source can be added, I will work on that ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 06:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, passes GNG per sources already in the article and per additional sources in the comments above. Cavarrone 21:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.