Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Train Sim World

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:47, 4 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Train_Simulator_(Dovetail_Games)#Sequel. Merge from page history as needed. czar 04:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Train Sim World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect was reverted so I've nominated for deletion. Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. I'm fine with this being redirected either to its predecessor Train Simulator (Dovetail Games) or the developer Dovetail Games. The1337gamer (talk) 19:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 19:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 19:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - and only spin out into its own article if it gets GNG meeting coverage. (Not ever sure a "merge" is warranted, as the article is short, and those charts aren't really appropriate at either location...) Sergecross73 msg me 20:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 16:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.