Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary–Morocco relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hungary–Morocco relations

whilst the 2 countries have embassies, there is a distinct lack of coverage of bilateral relations, almost all is multilateral [1]. LibStar (talk) 14:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The creator of this page User:Tamás Kádár was not told about this discussion on his talk page by the nominator. I have alerted him per WP:CIVIL.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Delete unless more can be found. I think it should be possible, since they would not have bothered exchanging embassies without a reason to do so. DGG (talk) 16:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:44, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although there is some significance in each nation maintaining an embassy in the other's capital, the details are properly mentioned in the "Foreign Relations of..." articles for Hungary and Morocco. Like DGG, I'd reconsider if something can be shown, but like LibStar, I found nothing in a news search to show that there is anything out of the ordinary between these two nations. They both have had red and green in their national flags, even at times there was no official recognition of Christmas. Mandsford (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject of the article, Hungary-Morocco relations, is not notable per our notability guidelines at WP:NOTE. Drawn Some (talk) 23:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion, the subject of this article, relations between two sovereign nations, is clearly notable. The problem is that notability must be verified. To do that, independent 3rd party sources providing significant coverage of the subject must be found. If such sources are not present, notability has not been established. That is the case here, notability has not yet been established because the article lacks independent sourcing. I actually found an independent source about a bilateral treaty between the two countries quite easily. [2] The nominator also acknowledges that relations exist (multilateral relations). This article should be kept and improved since the subject matter is notable and verifiable.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 03:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please provide evidence of significant coverage. 1 or 2 articles is not enough. LibStar (talk) 03:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. [3], [4], [5], [6] The two countries have had relations for some time. Here's a reference to them having diplomatic relations as far back as 1860 (although they had very little trade). [7] Both countries also fought in World War I, on opposite sides. That history could obviously be further developed.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 04:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another random pairing of countries that don't demonstrate actual notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - This article would be worth keeping if it provided more information on the bilateral agreement, but in the absence of that information it's difficult to justify a keep vote. Cedars (talk) 10:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per DGG. Yilloslime ^T_C 18:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability shown or likely. --BlueSquadronRaven 21:40, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.