User talk:DMySon

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:GermanKity per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanKity. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DMySon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You blocked me just after posting my 1st comment in the discussion. I am wondering why i was not notified by any of the editors involved in this discussion? This is a personal attack by a group of editors (It might be possible they all are one person or a group) who want to trap me. This investigation was created on 17 April 2022 by User:Extraordinary Writ without any further notice to me. Now i am surprised that i was not aware about this discussion from the first day but how the other users Hemantha and Mvqr came to know about this discussion? Are they notified by the creator of this investigation?

Furthermore i want to say that i am not aware about the editors Mickyshy, Jeniwolf, Joystick, etc.. If i involved in any of the discussions where these editors are involved, it might be accidently. The above explanations do not have valid points. Any editor can easily copy and paste of other editor's activity. And i don't know how many editors are following my pattern. This is a wrong close, anyone can easily copied my activities weather it is a new or an old user account. I always try to do constructive edits on Wikipedia as per best of my knowledge. Kindly look deeply into this case. DMySon (talk) 13:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You're going to have to do better than that to explain away the evidence in the SPI. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I always held you in high esteem, to say I’m disappointed would be an understatement. Celestina007 (talk) 23:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)