User talk:CristinaBenitezJones

Welcome!

Hello, CristinaBenitezJones, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! - AwfulReader^(talk) 14:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm AwfulReader. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cotter family, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - AwfulReader^(talk) 14:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julius Cotter (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julius Cotter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Julius Cotter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CristinaBenitezJones! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HONORIFICS/UGC

Hi. And welcome. In relation to this edit, please note that:

WP:UGC / WP:MIRROR - This webpage is a mirror of the equivalent Wikipedia page/content. Not only are other wikis (and other forms of user generated content) not considered reliable sources but, for obvious reasons, Wikipedia cannot be a source for itself.
MOS:HONORIFIC / MOS:SIR - If you added the above (cyclical/self-referring) source to the article to justify adding the honorific "Sir" to the text, then please note that (reliably referenced or not), using honorifics in running text is not in keeping with the related guidelines.

Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Guliolopez,

I am unsure as why you remove my edit regarding Sir Delaval Cotter Bt.

He would not be refered to as Delaval Cotter, but Sir Delaval Cotter, 6th Baronet of Rockforest, or Sir Delaval Cotter, Bt.

A baronet is always refered to as Sir Example, that is their title. It is different from that of a Lord who may be called Example One, 3rd Baron Example.

Please refer to the use of the baronet title in other wikipedia articles, included below, thankyou:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baronet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Nicholas_Bacon,_14th_Baronet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Annesley,_1st_Viscount_Valentia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominick_Sarsfield,_1st_Viscount_Sarsfield

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_John_Meade,_1st_Baronet CristinaBenitezJones (talk) 09:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]