Talk:Neum

Bosnia and Herzegovina C‑class Mid‑importance

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Neum is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities C‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

[Untitled]

Hi,

I just read the Wiki article for the bridge from Klek to Pelješac, they already approved it. The writer of this article might like to update it.

(18:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)~)

Meaning

What does "Border formalities with Croatia are relaxed at peak times." mean? 81.93.102.185 (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Needs protection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.125.149.167 (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's relaxed all the time. I went through there a while ago when it was raining and the guards didn't even come out of their shelter. They just waved me through. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.236.177.82 (talk) 22:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BiH coastline

The opening sentence states 24km, how did anyone calculate that? I travel up and down Dalmatia frequently and I believe you can walk from crossing to crossing in less than two hours. Any sources? --Janjušević (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Blocked sock:Evlekis.[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501140020/http://infoneum.com/index.php to http://www.infoneum.com/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080916194527/http://www.rfaf.ba/ to http://www.rfaf.ba/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"nationality"

I'm surprised to see the term "nationality" in the 2013 census results, which supposedly indicated that almost 98% of the population were "Croats" and fewer than 2% either "Bosniaks" or "Serbs". This suggests that almost all the inhabitants of this Bosnian town are foreign nationals, which if so would surely be a world record. You would also expect such an overwhelming majority of Croats to have called for Neum to secede from Bosnia and join Croatia, solving in one fell swoop the current problem of Croatia's division into two parts by this tiny intrusion of Bosnian territory, with time-consuming border checks at both ends (Bosnia is not in the EU, whereas Croatia is) - a problem Croatia is now attempting to tackle by building the costly and controversial Pelješac bridge across the entrance to Neum's harbour. What I suspect is that most of Neum's people are in fact Bosnian nationals, though this is not indicated anywhere in the article. Like other Bosnians they may consider themselves either Bosniaks (i.e. Muslims), Serbs or Croats, but that is surely not the same thing as "nationality" (even if that is the literal translation of the term used on the census forms). It is also significant that the percentage of people calling themselves "Croats" rose substantially (from 87%) and the percentage of people calling themselves "Bosniaks" or "Serbs" fell substantially (from just under 10%) since the 1991 census - held in the year that war broke out in the former Yugoslavia, eventually spreading to Bosnia. The difference could be explained by the unsurprising tendency of displaced Croats from elsewhere in Bosnia to concentrate in areas with a large Croatian majority, as close as possible to Croatia proper, and the equally unsurprising tendency of Bosniaks and Serbs to move away from such areas.

Anyway, I feel that a less ambiguous term than "nationality" should be used here - such as "stated ethnic affiliation".213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC) 98% of the citizens of Neum are Croats by "nationality" and as residents of Bosnia and Herzegovina they have Bosnian citizenship. But in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina is allowed dual citizenship, so almost all citizens of Neum, like all other Croats from Bosnia and Herzegovina also have Croatian citizenship since they are ethnic "Croats"[reply]

Map

Map has no legend. Can't understand it. Nine-and-fifty swans (talk) 21:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]