Jump to content

User talk:Badgersox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 00:43, 14 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Badgersox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -RFD (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading blocks by using multiple accounts per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Carthage44. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  —Bagumba (talk) 00:08, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badgersox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am new to this site and just created a sign in. If I did something wrong please give me a warning not a block where I can no longer edit as I am still learning to navigate this site. I have never created an account on this site so I am confused why I was blocked for multiple accounts. I am a baseball fan (White Sox fan first and foremost) so I enjoy editing those pages. I hope this was just a misunderstanding and I can get back to editing soon. Badgersox (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is obvious that you are a sockpuppet of Carthage44. You'll need to make future unblock requests from your original account. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badgersox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Reading into the unblock process, it says I can attempt to unblock again because I am not this carthage44 that you are saying you think I am. I don't know if I offended anyone on my first few edit on this site but if I did, I am sorry. This is very new to me and I just would like to edit and once I do make a few edit I get blocked. Not sure if this a right of passage for new editors but it doesn't seem right for someone to accuse me of being someone I am obviously not and just basing my block on the few edits I made were similar to someone elses. Does anyone that makes similar edits to the 2014 White Sox page get blocked to? I am just trying to understand why edits are encouraged on Wikipedia but once someone new like me makes some I am then blocked? I can promise you I am not that other users and I am very new to this site. Thanks Badgersox (talk) 05:33, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence at the SPI is very convincing. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.