User talk:SFaraci10

May 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

SFaraci10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here

I have been blocked before, but I have been sourcing my edits correctly and only focussing on the subjects that interest me, mostly focussed around sports in Connecticut or rugby, making sure the information is as up to date as possible. I apologize for my past actions for not correctly sourcing the material, but blocking someone indefinitely is a little outlandish for incorrectly sourcing material.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here
:I have been blocked before, but I have been sourcing my edits correctly and only focussing on the subjects that interest me, mostly focussed around sports in Connecticut or rugby, making sure the information is as up to date as possible. I apologize for my past actions for not correctly sourcing the material, but blocking someone indefinitely is a little outlandish for incorrectly sourcing material. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here
:I have been blocked before, but I have been sourcing my edits correctly and only focussing on the subjects that interest me, mostly focussed around sports in Connecticut or rugby, making sure the information is as up to date as possible. I apologize for my past actions for not correctly sourcing the material, but blocking someone indefinitely is a little outlandish for incorrectly sourcing material. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here
:I have been blocked before, but I have been sourcing my edits correctly and only focussing on the subjects that interest me, mostly focussed around sports in Connecticut or rugby, making sure the information is as up to date as possible. I apologize for my past actions for not correctly sourcing the material, but blocking someone indefinitely is a little outlandish for incorrectly sourcing material. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

SFaraci10 (talk) 01:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]