Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice Industrie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 08:01, 24 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voice Industrie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced and advertorially-toned article about a band with no particularly strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. As always, a band is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because they exist; reliable source coverage about them in media, demonstrating that they pass a notability criterion, must be present for an article to become earned. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 10:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: if kept, the article needs a good clear-up... the history seems to be based on the biography on the band's own website so it doesn't meet the requirements of an independent, reliable source, there are lots of unsourced and POV statements like "pounding dance beats, driving percussion and unrelenting electronic bliss" and "it seemed Levesque was not content to let the music remain stagnant. It continued to evolve", and I can't find where the critic reviews come from either, or the quote that Levesque has a "smooth 'Gahan-esq' (sic) voice". Richard3120 (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist Music1201 talk 16:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 16:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.