Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Friedman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:38, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Friedman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing at all actually convincing of his own independent notability because the best listed sources are (1) repeated and (2) The Business Insider is simply his own authored page where as the Forbes is actually only an interview; my own searches mirrored this also, finding nothing actually substantial. SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just not enough sources to show that he is the foremost expert in the field. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.