Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kaion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced autobiography of musician not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO. No significant coverage from WP:RS, just blogs and social media, and can't see any WP:RS online to verify all these claims of international touring, or airplay on a major radio or music television network. Wikishovel (talk) 07:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 07:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 07:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 02:29, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Many blog sources have been added today about Stan Arwell, but I can find no WP:RS online to confirm that Stanislaus Holub, Stan Arwell and Kaion are all the same person. Wikishovel (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Not yet notable.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as simply trivial and unconvincing sources for a trivial and unconvincing career, and everything shows it, including the history. SwisterTwister talk 23:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment after the article creator was softblocked for his COI name, the article was significantly edited by User:New editor 2017, a sockpuppet of prolific spam puppeteer OfficialPankajPatidar. So it's possible the article creator was also a sock, but I'm not going to bother the SPI admins about a blocked account. Wikishovel (talk) 06:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third-party WP:RS evident either in sources cited or in larger searches. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:07, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.