User talk:Rjp422

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rjp422. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. When you recently edited James Cantwell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marshfield and Marshfield High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christine Canavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brockton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Fox

Sure, go ahead and make the change, so long as you hang the references on it. You clearly understand what the problem with the previous version was; I didn't have the time (or the interest) to verify if the statement was true with that exception, or if perhaps there was something else you meant, and I particularly wanted to steer clear of putting something that might be untrue in a WP:BLP. I may take a look in at the article a time or two just to see if there's any rough edges that need polishing, but it's not something I expecting to be riding hard on. --Nat Gertler (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geraldine Creedon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmanuel College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Monstermike99 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rjp422 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there. I'm not a "sock puppet" for Monstermike99 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). We have worked on pages due to similar interests, but I can assure you I'm my own person. I usually edit & create lots of other pages as you can see from my history. Just because we agree on some edits, I have lots of other pages I can reference. Please let me know what I need to do to help resolve this dispute, as I would like to go back to work. Thanks.

Decline reason:

As I said at the other sock's talk page, I defer to the conclusions of the SPI. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.