Jump to content

Talk:Robin Lehner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) at 13:04, 29 May 2022 (Bot: Setting |oldid= for {{GA}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

deletion?

Correct me if I'm wrong but did Lehner not play in the Elitserien with Frolunda? It appears he did, and thus meets the notability criteria per WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE.--Freshfighter9 (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He did not. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 01:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding previous deletion

(In response to Tomas e's comment) I'm not sure if his contract alone is enough ensure that the article is currently valid (I want it to be), but i believe that as soon as he plays one NHL regular season game, then it should be fine. I was going to wait until that happened (hopefully soon), but I saw someone else threw up an article and I figured I might as well put up the one I had written beforehand with his previous stats. If it gets deleted now, then I will just keep it and resubmit when Lehner gets his first start. :) Cheers! Ibanez Guy (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could ask an admin to restore the latest revision before it was deleted. —KRM (Communicate!) 23:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Olympics

Why was Robin Lehner said to have mental health issues for not participating in the 2022 Olympics, when it was ultimately because the NHL decided not to send ANY players? This is a poorly leaded section. As someone with mental health issues, get your facts straight before you let someone post this. It isn't accurate. The NHL PULLED OUT OF THE OLYMPICS. NOT ROBIN LEHNER WITH DEPRESSION. 209.171.88.118 (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Robin Lehner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Prose

Lede

General

Review meta comments