Jump to content

Talk:Relationship between religion and science

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Smkolins (talk | contribs) at 17:03, 4 June 2022 (sorry - some how this got on the wrong talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 July 2020 and 31 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Redheadscholar, Ucsc Ava, Typo93.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 13 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kvtokar.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus Statistics

Under Surveys of Attitudes it reads "and 42% believed God existed, 42% disbelieved, and 17% had doubts/did not know; however when the study was replicated 80 years later using American Men and Women of Science in 1996, results were very much the same with 39% believing God exists, 45% disbelieved, and 15% had doubts/did not know."

42% believed God existed
42% disbelieved
17% had doubts/did not know
This adds up to 101%

39% believing God exists
45% disbelieved
15% had doubts/did not know
This adds up to 99% — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsimm2 (talkcontribs) 16:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's what happens when numbers are rounded. 41.6% + 41.7% + 16.7% = 100%, but if you round the values, they are 42%, 42% and 17%. Nothing bogus here. --Hob Gadling (talk) 11:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not comprehensive enough

Although the article now includes Sikhism and science, it is still not comprehensive since it lacks info about Zoroastrianism and science, and Zoroastrianism is no doubt vital because Judaism is heavily influenced by it, and prior to Arab conquest of Iran most residents there were Zoroastrians. Besides, it once spread to China and nowadays some Indians are Zorastrians.--RekishiEJ (talk) 09:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And now the article excludes Sikhism and science, which is impermissible since Sikhism is a major world religion, and Sikhism and science is no doubt Googleable.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 200 Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aashima99 (article contribs).