Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Iny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:15, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Iny

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for Notability since 2010. It is sourced to a single essay in a single book, and to 2 articles in an online, local Weekly. Google search turned up this Wikipedia article, her LinkedIn page, Facebook page, and the page of her employer, a nonprofit where she works in a fundraising capacity. Scanning a few more pages reveals some few sources including [1], spotlighting her political activism. ShulMaven (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 18. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:BIO. Ifnord (talk) 05:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The passing mentions in the 2 given references are a long-way short of provding coverage to meet the WP:ANYBIO criteria and multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) are providing nothing better. AllyD (talk) 18:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not seeing the notability here. Neutrality^talk 01:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable under any criterion. Shame on us for keeping this article since 2007, and kudos to ShulMaven for finding it, doing a thorough search for sources, and ultimately suggesting it needs to go.--MelanieN (talk) 04:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.