Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vlatka Jovanović

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Explicit (talk | contribs) at 14:32, 6 June 2022 (Vlatka Jovanović: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 14:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vlatka Jovanović (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a radio personality and former tennis player, not reliably sourced as having a strong claim to passing our notability criteria for broadcasters or tennis players. When it comes to radio, the notability claim is that her show exists, which is not an automatic notability freebie -- but the radio content is referenced entirely to her own employers rather than any evidence of reliable source coverage about her in third-party sources. And when it comes to tennis, there's a claim here that might possibly satisfy WP:NTENNIS (I'm admittedly not knowledgeable enough about tennis to know if it does or not) if it were sourced properly, but is still cited exclusively to deadlinked primary source directories rather than any evidence of GNG-worthy media coverage.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from actually having to have any reliable source coverage in real media. Even if a person has a plausible potential notability claim, they still have to have reliable source coverage to support it. Bearcat (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.