Jump to content

Talk:Lipstick feminism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mlclark1 (talk | contribs) at 13:23, 10 June 2022 (Update Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


the proponents and opponents sections need citations

Agreed. Eperotao (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Useful to know in what sense this is feminism?

Without citations and further explanation of how this fits into feminism, I would move to delete. So far, "lipstick feminism" appears to be a phrase more suitable for a dictionary than an encyclopedia entry. Eperotao (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be a subpage for sex-positive feminism? (B2018 (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Lipstick feminism vs. sex-positive feminism

Lipstick feminism seems to share certain characteristics with sex-positive feminism. I think this article should explain what the differences are something something I'm not yet clear on. --Cab88 (talk) 08:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lipstick feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the info in this article is getting sex-positive feminism confused with lipstick feminism. While these two topics are similar and related, they are different in scope and theory. The pictures included in the article are also unrelated and vague. They do not demonstrate the core thoughts of this idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mah599 (talkcontribs) 18:00, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2022 and 21 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LyricRhodes20 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ashley.restel.

— Assignment last updated by Mlclark1 (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]