User talk:Ghodbunder

hi how are you

Hi

Please disclose your old account. TrangaBellam (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 13:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not writing edit summaries. Can you explain why you changed "controversial" to "later developed into controversy"? Do you know what "controversial" means? And what exactly do you mean by "later"? Did either of those sources justify requiring a change? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the citation didnt mention the comment by Sharma was controversial. Ghodbunder (talk) 16:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary are necessarily required ?Ghodbunder (talk) 16:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, edit summaries are always required, unless it is obvious what you are doing.

You need to look up what "controversial" means in a dictionary.

You may also need to read the sources to see how they support the content. You can't just look for words. For example, the second source says:

Soon after Sharma’s remarks, the internet had exploded with questions about Aisha’s age when she got married and cartoons of the Prophet for marrying someone so young.

Does this warrant "later"? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the source you quoted nowhere say the remarks are controversial . the article must have to mention if its controversial or not . Ghodbunder (talk) 16:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the scroll syas this and i quote "BJP leader made the remarks during a show about the Gyanvapi mosque-Kashi Vishwanath temple dispute on Times Now on Thursday. A day later, the news channel distanced itself from Sharma’s comments after a huge controversy erupted on social media." i have edited the article as per RSGhodbunder (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does WP:RSOPINION say remove the source? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On what basis do you claim that The Wire is not a reliable source? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
on the basis of this discussion on RSN Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Scroll, OpIndia, The Wire, The Quint, The Print, DailyO, postcardnews, rightlog etc. Ghodbunder (talk) 07:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Nupur Sharma (politician), may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Packer&Tracker (talk) 11:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]