Jump to content

Talk:Gluten

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nythar (talk | contribs) at 02:17, 15 June 2022 (Removed 43 threads to Talk:Gluten/Archive 1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFood and drink B‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Template:Vital article

Modern grain does not contain more gluten

Why was this cut:

However, a 2020 study by the Leibniz-Institute for Food Systems Biology casts doubt on the idea that modern wheat has higher gluten levels. From a seed bank, they grew and analyzed 60 wheat cultivars from between 1891 and 2010 and found no changes in albumin/globulin and gluten contents over time. "Overall, the harvest year had a more significant effect on protein composition than the cultivar. At the protein level, we found no evidence to support an increased immunostimulatory potential of modern winter wheat."[1]

DolyaIskrina (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, the claim that modern wheat has more gluten is supported by only one source[2] and a secondary source[3] that relies only on that one original source. To present this claim in wikivoice without any sort of context is unwarranted. I'll be reading both of these sources to see if they are better than mere assertions of fact. DolyaIskrina (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Pronin, Darina; Borner, Andreas; Weber, Hans; Scherf, Ann (10 July 2020). "Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Breeding from 1891 to 2010 Contributed to Increasing Yield and Glutenin Contents but Decreasing Protein and Gliadin Contents". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02815. PMID 32648759.
  2. ^ Belderok, B. (2000-01-01). "Developments in bread-making processes". Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands). 55 (1): 1–86. doi:10.1023/A:1008199314267. ISSN 0921-9668. PMID 10823487. S2CID 46259398.
  3. ^ Volta U, Caio G, Tovoli F, De Giorgio R (September 2013). "Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: questions still to be answered despite increasing awareness". Cellular & Molecular Immunology (Review). 10 (5): 383–92. doi:10.1038/cmi.2013.28. PMC 4003198. PMID 23934026. mechanization of farming and the growing industrial use of pesticides have favored the development of new types of wheat with a higher amount of toxic gluten peptides that cause the development of gluten-related disorders

One researcher might have WP:UNDUE influence on this page

There are at least 15 pivotal citations from papers published with "U. Volta" participating. Frankly, I wonder if U. Volta is also editing this page. None of that is a problem per se, but the article should be a balanced look at the current state of knowledge, not a place for one person to trumpet their research. U. Volta seems to think gluten is a toxin created by the modern food industry and it is leading to a worldwide growing plague of disease. U. Volta might be right, but this extreme position needs to be given voice in proportion to the evidence. I'm sure U. Volta is a credentialed expert, but balance is required. DolyaIskrina (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as unbalanced

Since the advent of agriculture, i.e. for more than 10k years grains with a natural content of gluten have been a major component of the typical human diet around the World. As such, it is confounding that this article does not list a single benefit from the human consumption of gluten (e.g. when consumed as part of a diet with wheat or similar). I have tagged the article accordingly. Please remove only after addressing this self-evident concern. Lklundin (talk) 16:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it's negligible 🙃 FizzoXD (talk) 05:56, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

flurgy twinge

an illness only described in the book series redwall, the book called martin the warrior. there are no current known situation of flurgy twinge and the only recorded case was of a big strong hedgehog. unfortanatly after the experience he could never laugh again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.182.71.11 (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]