User:mjec

Quickguide

IThis user is a person, and nothing else matters.

This user's entire personality can be summed up in a few userboxes.

ubx-5This user uses entirely too many userboxes.

This user prefers using userboxes to fill up their user page instead of actually writing something useful.

This user does not understand mean people. Please be nice.

gkThis user is a geek.

This user has a keen interest in physics.

This user comes from Hobart.

@This user can be reached by email at michael.cordover@gmail.com.

This user's IRC nick is mjec on the server irc.freenode.net.

This user is a proud contributor to Uncyclopedia.

This user uses Azureus.

This user contributes using Firefox.

WinXPRegretfully, this user contributes using Microsoft Windows XP.

This user contributes using Gentoo Linux.

This user contributes using Vim.

$e^{i\pi \ }$This user is a mathematician.

This user knows by heart the first 75 digits in the decimal representation of pi.

SIThis user uses the metric system and loves it.

PHP-4This user is an expert PHP programmer.

reThis user writes regular expressions.

SQLThis user uses SQL queries to locate their car keys.

This user is interested in law.

This user is interested in politics.

This user believes it is every citizen's duty to vote.

This user supports Amnesty International.

This user supports the United Nations through the United Nations Youth Association of Australia.

its & it's

This user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you.

’s	Thi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.

OED	This user prefers Oxford spelling.

...This user is proud to say that they have kept their amateur procrastinator status intact.

Wikipedia:Babel

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

simple
4This user can write very clearly in Simple English.

Search user languages

This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

Currently 37 years old.

Check out the Australian Law wikiproject.