Jump to content

User talk:Kungfuadam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andormarketing (talk | contribs) at 14:09, 20 February 2007 (Andor Technology). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Kungfuadam/Status

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than (7) days are automatically archived to User talk:Kungfuadam/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

I will respond to messages here so please temporarily put my talk page on your watch list. This will prevent discombobulation of messages.


Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1
  2. Archive 2
  3. Archive 3
  4. Archive 4
  5. Archive 5
  6. Archive 6
  7. Archive 7
  8. Archive 8
  9. Archive 9
  10. Archive 10
  11. Archive 11


The Alter

Thank you for unblocking me.

--The Alter

AAA

Hi you deleted AAA (Ateliers d'Automobiles et d'Aviation), the French automobile marque. I can give you these sources on internet: a French site, a Dutch site, another Dutch site. Thanks for putting it back — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.139.240 (talkcontribs)

Doctor Steel

kungfuadmam, changes have been made to Doctor Steel and I would like to direct your attenation to the voting being done on the afd talk page.

Real Centrifugal Force

Hi Kungfuadam, I am writing to ask you why everybody is so keen to erase all suggestions that centrifugal force is a real force?

You yourself came in on the back of Henning Makholm and reverted his reversion.

Do you guys actually know what you are talking about? I read your original page on Centrifugal force and it was an incoherent shambles.

I tried to tidy it up and shorten it to key points. I have encountered nothing but resistance from elements who appear to know nothing at all about planetary orbital theory. I have now had to give two references, but they don't read the references. They delete religiously as if they believed that they were the last word on centrifugal force.

I can assure you that the centrifugal force is a key element in the differential equation for planetary orbits that leads to the elliptical, parabolic, and hyperbolic solutions.

My own physics department taught me that centrifugal force was only fictitious, but this fact is not born out when one studies orbital mechanics in applied mathematics.

I suspect that at best, these are physicists that are doing the reversions. Most physicists in my day never took those advanced courses in celestial mechanics. I suspect that this has been a widespread trend in recent times.

I can assure you that if you want this article to revert, it will be a very unprofessional article in which centrifugal force has been totally confused as being something exclusively relevant to circular motion.

I have been referred to as a vandal, a crackpot and spam by zealous Wikipedians who clearly haven't got a clue what they are talking about. As an administrator I would be most obliged if you might request that these censors at least put their reasons forward, instead of using short captions like, vandal, false edits etc.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely David Tombe 10th February 2007 (210.213.229.36 15:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.213.229.36 (talk) 15:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hmm, why this long tirade? I didn't write the article, I was removing vandalism or pov or something. What a waste of time :)--Kungfu Adam (talk) 13:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 7 12 February 2007 About the Signpost

US government agencies discovered editing Comment prompts discussion of Wikimedia's financial situation
Board recapitulates licensing policy principles WikiWorld comic: "Extreme ironing"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I submitted my first article "Last Common Ancestor" but it is getting confused with "Last common ancestor" (note lower case)which you deleted last year.

I am an extreme wiki novice. Can you recommend something for me to do so I will get all the LCA traffic, not just the searches in initial capitals?

-- Tom Schmal 19:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for your assistance on the California Gold Rush Main page article! NorCalHistory 01:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wildercon

Hi, you deleted the Wildercon entry from the Wiki saying that it was just another non-notable fan event.

This is not true, Wildercon was the first anime festival in the UK of it's kind. It intruduced many new things to the anime comunity and set a number of things that have since been adopted by other events.

I see there no reason why people should not be able to read about this peace of UK anime fandom history on the Wiki.

Can this be re-instated? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wraith2 (talkcontribs) 11:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Casey-Jane

Please delete that article. FatalError12345 supported the request for it to be deleted then went on to do everything possible to edit it enough to try & save it! I'm not sure why on earth (s)he would do that, especially as I had explained the situation to him/her, but (s)he just went on to make it even worse! This is causing a lot of distress & upset, so please, please, just delete it. :-( Jennyacedaras 18:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Casey-Jane

Thank you very very much. :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jennyacedaras (talkcontribs) 20:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

While monitoring my past AfDs...

While monitoring my past AfDs, I've noticed this: [1] and the fact that you forgot to update the AfD discussion here. Happy Editing by Snowolf(talk)C on 18:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 8 19 February 2007 About the Signpost

From the editor
Arbitrator Dmcdevit resigns; replacements to be appointed Essay questions Wikipedia's success: Abort, Retry, Fail?
In US, half of Wikipedia traffic comes from Google WikiWorld comic: "Tony Clifton"
News and notes: Brief outage, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Andor Technology

Hi Adam

You deleted the entry Andor Technology. Looking through Wikipedia there are several companies and organisations listed such as Microsoft and Roper Industries.

I see our entry on a similarly pitched level as these, so I would be interested to know why it was removed even after it had been re-edited. How cam I go about relisting again? Thanks.

Mark Andormarketing 14:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]