Talk:Edvard Munch

Norway B‑class

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Munch museum redirect?

The Munch museum should have its own article, don't y'all agree? --Leifern 12:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It should. The Norwegian article might be useful for making an English one [1] Cybbe 18:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Name pronounciation

What is the proper pronounciation of Munch's name?

To an English speaker it'd be something like "moonk", with "oo" as in "good"

And the first name?

I guess the last d is silent. --1523 21:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that should be 'unvoiced'? - So it would sound something like 'edvart' ? Stumps 15:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the pronunciation nor the discussion here seems to conform to the IPA values given at Norwegian language --Dupes 16:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now it does. The sound in question is a retroflex assimilation of /r/ and /d/, just like in many Swedish dialects. That means that two underlying phonemes have merged into one sound. And to the best of my knowledge, Norwegian doesn't devoice word-final plosives.

Peter ^Isotalo 01:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google

Hey I figured out colours...

Anyway, "The Scream" is a Google logo at the moment if anyone's interested. --WikiSlasher 11:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure. :) And a nice one. -- Pichote 11:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, so perhaps the page should be protected to prevent the vandalism that typically results. RyanLivingston 13:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to assuming good faith? We're now assuming that linking to our pages causes vandalism rather than improvements to the page? Has any vandalism been detected? Stevage 00:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The logo only links to the Google search for the term "Edvard Munch" it does not directly link to the article. And last time I checked Wikipedia was only the third or fourth result anyway and the protection policies do not allow for protecting pages because of predicted vandalism that hasn't happened yet. --WikiSlasher 02:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK so there was a little bit of vandalism I admit. --WikiSlasher 02:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should be unprotected now, I think. 70.104.16.182 03:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I agree, there shouldn't be much problem now. ParsifalTG

Well, I just came here on this page by the google logo, so at least in Switzerland (UTC+1) it's still current. In future, one should maybe wait some other hours after 00:00 until unprotecting again. --CHamul 06:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edvard Munch is #2 at this Google Search (from the image click) [2] — Deon555^talk_desk 05:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]