Talk:Priyanka Chopra

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Priyanka Chopra article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6: 6 months

Template:Vital article

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Priyanka Chopra is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 14, 2013.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 26, 2012	Good article nominee	Not listed
October 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
February 8, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
March 15, 2013	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
June 21, 2013	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
July 23, 2013	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 18, 2018, and July 18, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Bihar Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in October 2012.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Beauty Pageants Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beauty Pageants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of beauty pageants, their contestants and winners on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Beauty PageantsWikipedia:WikiProject Beauty PageantsTemplate:WikiProject Beauty PageantsBeauty Pageants
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18 March 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Matthew Phiong (August 30, 2006). "WikiCharts Top 100 most viewed Wikipedian pages". "Blog is Everything".

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2018, when it received 11,491,748 views.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

Sources for aeronautical engineering aspirations

The one discussion I could find in archives about it is Talk:Priyanka Chopra/Archive 2#Early life. Could someone add citations for the said interview? Also, there is no mention of it in the body but only in the lead. I believe it might have been present in the body when the FAR was done. Or else, FAR wouldn't have passed. Could someone who has the knowledge of the article and the citations introduce it back in the Early life/Career beginnings section, where appropriate? MOS:INTRO -- DaxServer (talk) 09:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article have lots of claims without proper source, The astronomer thing I don't buy that.Holland Tok (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this page is too laudatory

too many details about he career - and presented in the most positive light. reads like a press release/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by UBU07 (talk • contribs) 04:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree on this this article is biased and looking like propoganda to promot her in USA. Claiming she is highest paid actress, biggest entertainer of India. This is not true. She don't live in India from last 4 yrs and lots of new actresses became popular in that time, she is not highest paid actress of India, why? Beacuse she didn't worked in India from 2,3 years. Holland Tok (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protected edit request on August 6 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Request to update text in Early Life section where Ladakh is mentioned geographically incorrect. please change "cold northwestern Indian desert region" with "cold north-eastern Indian desert region"

Not done: It certainly looks more west than east. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pls add that Priyanka Chopra is BVLGARI new global ambassador

Priyanka Chopra has been claimed as the new global ambassador of BVLGARI, this year 2021.. https://flaunt.com/content/bvlgari-priyanka-chopra-jonas Ka903 (talk) 02:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She produced a bhojapuri film

Bam Bam Bol rahe he Kashi - a bhojapuri film, she produced. Source - https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/photo-features/priyanka-chopras-controversies/pc-ayesha-mehra/photostory/49289195.cms Holland Tok (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See her filmography. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All due respect to Priyanka, I love her but...

She is not the highest paid actress of India in present 2021. She left India long time ago and don't work in Bollywood. Her last significant role was of Kashibai in 3 years ago. I suggest remove that she is highest paid actress of India. Source - 1.https://www.statista.com/statistics/1268258/india-best-paid-female-actors-by-earnings-per-film/ Per India Today Dipka Padukone is Ind's highest paid actress.source- https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/deepika-padukone-on-being-india-s-highest-paid-actress-a-part-of-me-feels-guilty-1607511-2019-10-09. Holland Tok (talk) 08:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aslo the line says that, She is most popular entertainer of India, it is also false, India have 29 states and only folks of 6 or 7 states speak & understand Hindi language properly, others watch regional & Hollywood movies more than bollywood so she is not span Ind entertainer, in South India other actresses's are more famous than her. Take a look of most popular, most entertainer actress of South India, this part have approx 50% India's land. Top 25 Most Beautiful South Indian Actress Name, Top 25 Most Beautiful South Indian Actress Name, source-https://en.janbharattimes.com/entertainment/most-beautiful-south-indian-actress-name-photos%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwi3j6qSxvn0AhVfwTgGHfpNAV0QFnoECAUQBQ&usg=AOvVaw2tQnh0ubVTaZrLBbMAc2Bn All this lead section is trying to portrait a image Priyanka Chopra to the world & USA readers that she is the biggest film actress of India, which not true. It looks like someone doing propoganda to promot her. It is like fooling readers. Holland Tok (talk) 08:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Holland Tok: "Chopra is one of India's highest-paid", can you read it? It is said in the article as "one of" not "the most". I don't know why you are trying to do here but the article never says she is the highest-paid Indian actress. This article cites sources to prove any claims in it and if it is not, it will be removed. However, the most popular entertainer part is already sourced and it does not need a source from 2021 to claim that she is because she still is popular and active until now. Can you prove your own claim that "only folks of 6 or 7 states speak & understand Hindi language properly"? Did you know that there is no Berlin Wall in India that divides people in the West and East Berlin? Did you know that people can be bilingual; people in Kerala can speak Tamil and people in Maharashtra can speak Telugu? May I know what your point is? You can still go outside or to the other sides of India without any difficulty.

People can watch her movies at theatres with subtitles; translators exist. It does not matter if it's only six or seven states, she is still popular and the media says she is. Do you have proof to claim it's wrong? Can you give me an article saying that she's not popular? This article is not trying to make her have an image of the best actress of India, but it's all said by reliable sources and you can click those numbers in the end of a sentence to read the article cited by this article. If you think it's biased, then don't read this article because Wikipedia is not the only source you can click on Internet. The article just resays what it's in the media and journalists and newspapers have said about her. You can read books or articles about her everywhere if you have some money. Once more, the article never claims she is the most popular or highest-paid actress; she is ONE OF the most popular and highest-paid actressES.

Her leave from India has nothing to do here. She still has Indian citizenship and she has not been an American citizen, so she is still Indian. Please make a structured argument next time and stop saying stupid things before you do your research. Anything in this article are well cited and you can dislike it but you can't remove it solely due to your disagreement with what the article says about her even though it is cited from reliable sources such as Rediff.com and The Express Tribune. Your feelings are not reliable sources; don't forget, Bajirao Mastani was released six years ago not three. I can see here that you are so jealous of her, but sadly reputable newspapers have said so. I wish someone heals your jealousy, which apparently would not happen because you are already using your feelings to prove your claim. Thank you and stay envy. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 May 2022

Her daughter’s name is Malti Marie Chopra Jonas.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2603:7080:8F03:BF00:51B:B4C8:70AE:A4A9 (talk) 11:17, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

She is 40 not 39 years old 2022-1982=40 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.96.14.98 (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Her daughters stay in the NICU

I just wanted to reach out and say I had my first son at 25 weeks and he stayed 99 days in the NICU. They truly are a blessing. 70.30.118.83 (talk) 22:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]