User talk:JordanKSM

This is JordanKSM's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your removal of text at Chinese people in Myanmar

Chinese people in Myanmar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Here you removed 46,000 bytes of text from the article with the edit summary 'Removed jingoist edits'. You've repeated this removal a number of times. An editor reported you to ANI but no action has yet been taken. Such removals need discussion and agreement among editors. Be aware that if this happens again you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston:. That's not "removal". There's an edit in February that restores old COPYVIO content that has not been accepted by the community. Did you even read the section? It's all about how the Chinese are superior. That's why so many users have removed it. JordanKSM (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained more at the talk page.JordanKSM (talk) 22:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Chinese people in Myanmar

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

since you continued to revert after my above warning. If I read the talk page at Talk:Chinese people in Myanmar there is no evident consensus for your view. We expect that editors will follow the steps of WP:Dispute resolution when disagreements occur, instead of trying to force their views into the article by reverting. EdJohnston (talk) 02:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A previous complaint about your edits of this article can be seen at this ANI link. EdJohnston (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WTF is wrong with you? Can you read what I write on the talk page! Or are you in cahoot with CCP? JordanKSM (talk) 14:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your ANI was created by the Chinese user. Did the edition added by indef-blocked User:Backendgaming have consensus? The Chinese love to play the game. JordanKSM (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dominated by whites who love to kick others around & paid CCP editors. The project is hopeless. JordanKSM (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's sure your users are in cahoots. Using back-channel communication to mass revert. JordanKSM (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't revert it anymore. It's so ugly and speaks for itself. But I will re-add KMT invasion that was removed by User:Yue without consensus. 14:42, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Here, your user is using a nonexistent source to push POV. It's established at WP:ANI and WP:Dispute Resolution#Summary_of_dispute_by_Stress_theorist. JordanKSM (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to @Stress theorist: to see his views on this matter. JordanKSM (talk) 14:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]