Jump to content

User talk:JordanKSM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JordanKSM (talk | contribs) at 19:36, 28 July 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your removal of text at Chinese people in Myanmar

Here you removed 46,000 bytes of text from the article with the edit summary 'Removed jingoist edits'. You've repeated this removal a number of times. An editor reported you to ANI but no action has yet been taken. Such removals need discussion and agreement among editors. Be aware that if this happens again you are risking a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston:. That's not "removal". There's an edit in February that restores old COPYVIO content that has not been accepted by the community. Did you even read the section? It's all about how the Chinese are superior. That's why so many users have removed it. JordanKSM (talk) 21:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've explained more at the talk page.JordanKSM (talk) 22:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@EdJohnston (talk) Don't listen to Special:Contributions/JordanKSM as I have yet to reply to that respective article's talk page and all his vituperative ad-hominem attacks towards me over the last couple of months. None of his egregious claims hold any water trying to contradict the voluminous catalog of reliably robust scholarly sources that corroborate the statements made in that particular article prior to his tendentious removals by removing pertinent referenced statements, cited work, and disputing the reliability of sources that substantially meet the criteria for reliable sources set forth by Wikipedia's standards. Nothing he has suggested including the changes made to the Chinese people in Burma article constituted anything constructive that would improve the article. Instead of rationally trying to make a persuasive counterargument justifying why my additions are "factually incorrect," all he does is hurl all sorts of baseless ad-hominem attacks at me. Plus his tendentious removals obviously constitute violations of WP:DISRUPTSIGNS by repeatedly removing reliable sources posted by me and other established editors in the past are WP:DISRUPTIVE editing as well as violating of WP:REMOVECITE, WP:REFREMOVAL, WP:IDONTLIKEIT, & WP:NOTCENSORED policies. SimeonManier (talk) 16:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Chinese people in Myanmar

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

since you continued to revert after my above warning. If I read the talk page at Talk:Chinese people in Myanmar there is no evident consensus for your view. We expect that editors will follow the steps of WP:Dispute resolution when disagreements occur, instead of trying to force their views into the article by reverting. EdJohnston (talk) 02:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A previous complaint about your edits of this article can be seen at this ANI link. EdJohnston (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WTF is wrong with you? Can you read what I write on the talk page! Or are you in cahoot with CCP? JordanKSM (talk) 14:11, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your ANI was created by the Chinese user. Did the edition added by indef-blocked User:Backendgaming have consensus? The Chinese love to play the game. JordanKSM (talk) 14:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dominated by egoist admins who love to kick others around & paid CCP editors. The project is hopeless. JordanKSM (talk) 14:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's sure your users are in cahoots. Using back-channel communication to mass revert. JordanKSM (talk) 14:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I won't revert it anymore. It's so ugly and speaks for itself. But I will re-add the KMT invasion that was removed by User:Yue without consensus. JordanKSM (talk) 15:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here, your user is using a nonexistent source to push POV. It's established at WP:ANI and WP:Dispute Resolution#Summary_of_dispute_by_Stress_theorist. JordanKSM (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I want to @Stress theorist: to see his views on this matter. JordanKSM (talk) 14:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In case you aren't aware, other users have raised their concerns on the talk page of User:SimeonManier. The concerns regarding the section have been raised so many times. It doesn't matter if it's 46k or whatever. It's a duplicate of similar sections at "Chinese in X" articles with only minor changes for the country. JordanKSM (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JordanKSM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The admin has no understanding of the issue at hand, abused his power, and blocked based on my emotional replies that had been reverted by myself (the reporting user, who was also mass-reverting and pushing POV as others have pointed out, deliberately used diffs in such a way). First, can you see what's going on at Talk:Chinese_people_in_Myanmar#WP:DUCK_sock and Talk:Aung San. Users are adding content with fake sources WP:Dispute Resolution#Summary_of_dispute_by_Stress_theorist.

User:SimeonManier is a WP:DUCK sock of User:Backendgaming. He's restoring the "Trade and Industry" sections in all articles about "Chinese in X"; the sections are basically a racist rant against whichever country the Chinese reside in. The concerns have been raised on his talk page as well. The "Trade and Industry" section here is an exact replica of Hoa_people#Trade_and_industry with the same sources (Yos Santasombat, Amy Chua, etc., not a single specialist from the said country is included) and with the same unreadable massive paragraphs.

That's nothing racist about pointing out a cahoots of users pushing POV across a massive number of articles. If you want to see who is the real "racists", just compare the content I added to your "Trade and Industry" sections.

If you love to protect those cahoot of people who are conquering by the numbers, then I have no qualms. This project is doomed. 

JordanKSM (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. Your attacks on this page are enough to decline this request. I think you need to find another topic to edit about. 331dot (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: What attack? Have you seen a user indef-blocked for a rude reply? Which policy do you have? Isn't it an abuse of power? JordanKSM (talk) 19:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at User_talk:SimeonManier#Your_Han_Chinese_chauvinist_edits and how he attacked others who pointed out his racist edits. JordanKSM (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

JordanKSM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was based on the ANI report here. The diffs the reporter used have already been reverted by me long before the report was filed. I replied emotionally when I saw the block. Those have been already reverted. Indef block for that? None of the admins here are willing to invest time in understanding the content dispute but judge extremely harshly based on little evidence they see at first sight. A little bit of humbleness and browsing through those videos here might be helpful. JordanKSM (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The block was based on the ANI report [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1100966049 here]. The diffs the reporter used have already been reverted by me long before the report was filed. I replied emotionally when I saw the block. Those have been already reverted. '''Indef block for that?''' None of the admins here are willing to invest time in understanding the content dispute but judge extremely harshly based on little evidence they see at first sight. A little bit of humbleness and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt1ORGpLX8o browsing through those videos here] might be helpful. [[User:JordanKSM|JordanKSM]] ([[User talk:JordanKSM#top|talk]]) 19:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The block was based on the ANI report [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1100966049 here]. The diffs the reporter used have already been reverted by me long before the report was filed. I replied emotionally when I saw the block. Those have been already reverted. '''Indef block for that?''' None of the admins here are willing to invest time in understanding the content dispute but judge extremely harshly based on little evidence they see at first sight. A little bit of humbleness and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt1ORGpLX8o browsing through those videos here] might be helpful. [[User:JordanKSM|JordanKSM]] ([[User talk:JordanKSM#top|talk]]) 19:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The block was based on the ANI report [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1100966049 here]. The diffs the reporter used have already been reverted by me long before the report was filed. I replied emotionally when I saw the block. Those have been already reverted. '''Indef block for that?''' None of the admins here are willing to invest time in understanding the content dispute but judge extremely harshly based on little evidence they see at first sight. A little bit of humbleness and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt1ORGpLX8o browsing through those videos here] might be helpful. [[User:JordanKSM|JordanKSM]] ([[User talk:JordanKSM#top|talk]]) 19:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

JordanKSM (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JordanKSM&oldid=1100997703"