Jump to content

Talk:Mount Ophir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Geomathics (talk | contribs) at 07:36, 1 August 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMountains NA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndonesia Redirect‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rename Article to "Gunung Ledang"

Why is this mountain called "Mount Ophir" when the malay name "Gunung Ledang" probably exist earlier and is the currently most common version used in Malaysia? The National Park at the same location is named Gunung Ledang National Park and not Mount Ophir National Park. A movie based on the legends surrounding the mountain is titled (English) "The Princess of Mount Ledang". The malay name is also used by Singaporean and foreign climbers. I suggest that this article be renamed to Gunung Ledang or Mount Ledang. I prefer the malay name Gunung Ledang as the word "Gunung" means "mountain" in malay and the two words combined is a proper noun, c.f. Mont Blanc (French) and not Mount Blanc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.217.76.77 (talkcontribs) 01:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - do you have any evidence that your proposed name is more common in English? There seem to be many more instances of "Mount Ophir" on google, for example, excluding the wikipedia ones. --Cheers, Komdori 18:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and Comment: Ophir, which occurs in the Bible, is very ambiguous. How are searches that include Malaysia? (Actually attempting this search gets me here (PDF) which says: "Gunung Ledang (or Mount Ophir as it is better known)" which is more decisive than google results anyway.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 09:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Signs in Malaysia only refer to Gunung Ledang. Plus, a search for "Gunung Ledang" give much more results than for "Ophir Johor". (As Mount Ophir can mean other places). AtikuX (talk) 04:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Ophir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]