Jump to content

Inception score

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cosmia Nebula (talk | contribs) at 20:36, 22 August 2022 (Definition: fix). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Inception Score (IS) is an algorithm used to assess the quality of images created by a generative model, like a generative adversarial network (GAN).[1] It has been somewhat superseded by the Fréchet inception distance.[2]

Definition

Let there be two spaces, the space of images and the space of labels . The space of labels is finite.

Let be a probability distribution over that we wish to judge.

Let a discriminator be a function of type where is the set of all probability distributions on . For any image , and any label , let be the probability that image has label , according to the discriminator. It is usually implemented as an Inception-v3 network trained on ImageNet.

The Inception Score of relative to isEquivalent rewrites includeTo show that this is nonnegative, use Jensen's inequality.

Pseudocode:

INPUT discriminator .

INPUT generator .

Sample images from generator.

Compute , the probability distribution over labels conditional on image .

Sum up the results to obtain , an empirical estimate of .

Sample more images from generator, and for each, compute .

Average the results, and take its exponential.

Return the result.

Interpretation

A higher inception score is interpreted as "better", as it means that is a "sharp and distinct" collection of pictures.

, where is the total number of possible labels.

iff for almost all That means is completely "indistinct". That is, for any image sampled from , discriminator returns exactly the same label predictions .

The highest inception score is achieved if and only if the two conditions are both true:

  • For almost all , the distribution is concentrated on one label. That is, . That is, every image sampled from is exactly classified by the discriminator.
  • For every label , the proportion of generated images labelled as is exactly . That is, the generated images are equally distributed over all labels.

See also

References

  1. ^ Salimans, Tim; Goodfellow, Ian; Zaremba, Wojciech; Cheung, Vicki; Radford, Alec; Chen, Xi; Chen, Xi (2016). "Improved Techniques for Training GANs". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 29. Curran Associates, Inc.
  2. ^ Borji, Ali (2022). "Pros and cons of GAN evaluation measures: New developments". Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 215: 103329. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2021.103329.