Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 15

< August 14	August 16 >

August 15

File:Here We Go Again (Nelson-Marsalis ft.Jones).ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:04, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recording sample unnecessary to help readers understand the tribute album Here We Go Again: Celebrating the Genius of Ray Charles. May fail WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 06:58, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in song article since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion there. Delete from album especially since there is not enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion there. Aspects (talk) 23:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC) (Edit to add: Struck out my incorrect edit. Aspects (talk) 13:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC))[reply]
It's not used in the song article currently. Rather a sample of the original recording is already used there. George Ho (talk) 07:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NotBeingWindstorm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 04:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jed Madela.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source claims it was previously published on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/jedmadelaofficial/photos/ms.c.eJwzNDA0NTY2MjQ0Mzc0MLEwMtQzRBIxRhcxMEMXMTLCFLFEFzEHiQAAdn0VOw~-~-.bps.a.10153321166904821.1073741835.54838224820/10153321167104821/?type=1&theater. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see c:COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file (applicable on English Wikipedia too). Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JedAllAboutLove.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source claims "Previously published: facebook.com/jedmadelaofficial, instagram.com/teamjedmadela." Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see c:COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file (applicable on English Wikipedia too). Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nstcm-logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, badly drawn. Superseded by File:Logo Compagnie du chemin de fer Nyon-St-Cergue-Morez.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:41, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, feel free to nuke Elwell (talk) 00:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 04:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ntrjr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:46, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UnmaadOct2009 Floor Painting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.