User talk:ShresthaShome.Ullas

Begins My First Day at Wikipedia

Wish me good luck. ShresthaShome.Ullas @talk 16:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Good luck, ShresthaShome.Ullas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Bishonen | tålk 16:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nuclear tsunami (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nuclear tsunami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nuclear tsunami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ShresthaShome.Ullas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Deb (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Jijisipu (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

• Can you please clarify which article you're talking about? I am new here. So, my actions can seem random. But the objectives are neutral. Some articles are in dire need of updates. ShresthaShome.Ullas (talk) 17:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

  I mean Osmanabad district. I can see you have cut past move the article to Dharashiv district which is not allowed, plus the article's history reveals that Osmanabad district is the WP:CommonName of that article. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with wikipedia's policy before making mass changes. If you need any assistance please ask on WP: Teahouse. Thank you. Jijisipu (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

  • So it means, moving a page directly is not possible unless someone changes the common name?

  ShresthaShome.Ullas (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

  Cut and paste move are not allowed. Jijisipu (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi! Our speedy deletion process can only be requested or applied in narrow range of cases; the specific allowable criteria are here. Please don't waste your time and that of others by requesting any speedy deletion for any reason not listed there – no admin is going to accept such a request. If you really think that Krishna and Radha in a Pavilion should be deleted you can start a deletion discussion; you'll need to produce some strong policy-based reasons for that to have any chance of success. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Let's not go ahead with criteria. The article itself was made without any criteria. It was made back in 2009 when a lot of bad articles used to float around created by amateur members. A lot of such bad articles have been deleted by admins since then. Why is this one still here? It is the duty of admins to keep Wikipedia safe, healthy and neat. It is beyond any reason why that kind of article is still on Wikipedia. Why don't you take measures yourself to delete it? Wikipedia should be free and fare for every community. Targeting a certain community is not good. ShresthaShome.Ullas (talk) 23:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Dharashiv Tahsil‎. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Can you please stop censoring Indian art?

I feel you need to be neutral towards all religions, and accept historical facts. Hinduism does not have blasphemy. Please don't imitate some other religions. Don't keep deleting Wikipedia pages just because you, as a user, has a very small range of tolerance. Respect Indian art and literature. Also the original literature is from Jayadev's Gita Govind, a masterful Sanskrit author. Even Kalidas wrote similar erotic scenes between Shiva and Parvati. So don't go on doing censorship attempts on Indian art and literature. And please stop blackmailing and threatening companies and historians with "boycotts", etc. It's rude, bigoted and improper. Nathularog (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

If someone is wrong, it doesn't mean people will accept it. I'm talking about the painting, not about some other literature. If those people are wrong, no matter what position they held in past, we should discard them and move on. Supporting them because of arrogance is wrong. And who are you to say that Hinduism does not have blasphemy? Forget Devaninda, even killing a cow was punishable by death in Maratha empire. But that is not the point. It is about wikipedia. What wikipedia stands for? Is wikipedia waiting for getting slapped with IPC section 295A which is basically Indian blasphemy law?

Also, your rhetoric about censorship nonsense is hypocrisy considering wikipedia has WP:THEYDONTLIKEIT argument for specifically cases like above. You should read more rules on WP before joining. And most importantly, If you are so tolerant, stop forcing others to be like you. You are not even Hindu. It seems you're Muslim or Atheist. So, stop talking like you get to decide what we want. We are not biased, we want wikipedia to be neutral. Nathularog (talk) 06:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not about what communal people like or not, it's about what is truth. It's about showing historical facts, as it is. It's not about censorship. Hinduism does not have blasphemy, and it's as a historical fact. Wikipedia edits should reflect it.

How can anyone discard age old Sanskrit devotional literature? To discard Kalidas, Jaydev or Andal? What religious authority does one have to do it?

People should tolerance for variety of ideas, at least about religion. That's what Hinduism has promoted- assimilation of different ideas. One should not impose their authoritarian doctrines on public forums.

IPC does not apply to publishing of real historical facts, art and literature. In fact these very laws are colonial era laws.

And one should not insult others by assuming their religion, and stereotyping them according to their assumed idea about a community.

Nathularog (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

What kind of logic is this? How do you connect ancient literature with modern paintings? Even Kamasutra never had any erotic paintings unlike modern books claiming to be Kamasutra are sold with 100s of pornographic images, let alone Dharmic literatures. You are connecting vulgar paintings with Kalidasa literature. You need to leave Wikipedia ASAP and head back to school.

Erotic paintings were always discouraged. Again, read about Devaninda topic on internet. There used to be capital punishment for Devaninda according to Shastras. Internet is free. It does not need much practice to find an useful article. Again, if I were you, blasphemy would've been my least concern. No, self respecting, backboned man will tolerate something like this towards his own culture (assuming you are one) under no condition not even so called "Hurr durr I am tolerant, I am different, I am better than nazis" argument. Saying that we should tolerate everything because it will make us better than other intolerant people is like eating dirt because nazis eat better food and saying "look, I'm better than nazis because I eat dirt and they do not." How will you live without water or Oxygen then when so called intolerant people also live using those? What will you do if someone take arms to kill your whole family? Will you hide cowardly and calm yourself saying "I'm better than them" while they butcher your kin? Also there is Paradox of tolerance argument. The painting that you are defending was made under british patronage using brown sepoys like you (sorry to speak like this but nobody can keep calm while they see their culture under genocide by foreign forces like wikipedia while you work under them like a wikipedia volunteer). So, leave this colonial hangover. Free your mind and work against any propaganda that is against your own culture (again assuming you are one of us).

Hinduism is not self destructive. Hinduism never allows foreign ideas specially while denigrate Hinduism itself and goes against basic principles. It is Indian communist propaganda that Hinduism allows assimilation of different ideas since Hinduism does not have better thing on it's own. Even this notion is colonial conspiracy that Hinduism is bad and needs immediate reforms. Read Bhagvad Geeta's 3th chapter: Following one's own Dharma albeit imperfectly is still better than following someone else's Dharma perfectly. (4/35)

Hinduism does not need reform. But Hindus need revolution. Hindus need to follow purest form of Hinduism without man made evil practices. Hindus need to know about their own Dharma which they don't know unfortunately.

I challenge you to directly cite any Dharmic Shastra which says that Hinduism allows tolerance for variety of idea even if it is against Hinduism or represents our Dharmavatar(s )in a bad way. You will not find any. There are many so called Indologists who have tried to propagate this self destructive idea and actually became successful (you're an example) but those who know about Dharma in depth (like me) are not being trapped in their deceit.

What makes you think I am authoritarian for acting against the establishment (wikipedia admins who still allow this article)? If anything I am the rebel. I am the anti-establishment fighter who is fighting for his cause.

Last but not least, keeping that vulgar painting will not make wikipedia better or should I say neutral non-censorship some kind of angel organization. Rather, it will be seen as a dog whistle. Deleting it will make wikipedia look better, cleaned and non-partial. It will also improve wikipeadia's fading reputation. It may be against some middle aged fat admins who don't seem to end exposing their racism and communalism under FOE and non censorship argument. But that is better. Wikipedia should not be 100% tolerant towards everything. IT MUST BE INTOLERANT TOWARDS HATE, VULGARITY, RACISM AND CULTURAL GENOCIDE. Little intolerance and censorship is always good when it is used for betterment of the society. ShresthaShome.Ullas (talk) 09:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of Krishna and Radha in a Pavilion

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Krishna and Radha in a Pavilion, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! – NJD-DE (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)