User talk:IamNasirZaman

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, IamNasirZaman! I am Matthewrb and I am the volunteer who received your account request. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! ~ Matthewrb ^{Talk to me · Changes I've made} 16:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Champ Imi (fashion model) (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Sun, Metro and Daily Mail are deprecated sources so need to be removed along with the content they support (see their listings at WP:RSP), unless you can replace them with reliable sources. Interviews are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. Being a Lux Style winner in itself does not establish notability, although it may be an indicator. What is needed is in-depth independent coverage about him from multiple reliable sources. Please also see the notability guidelines for models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Champ Imi (fashion model) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IamNasirZaman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Champ Imi (fashion model) (August 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: see Champ Imi and related deletions.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies of living persons sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 08:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, IamNasirZaman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Champ Imi (fashion model), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sikander Ghuman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sikander Ghuman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In particular, most of the sources appear to be interviews with the subject, which are not good for establishing that the subject deserves its own article. Also, the "Background" section of the article is very promotional and needs to be toned down. Ovinus (talk) 18:32, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muqadas Farooq Awan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muqadas Farooq Awan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muqadas Farooq Awan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry + Paid editing

Hello, on Talk:Muqadas Farooq Awan you asked a question regarding Sockpuppetry. Please disclose: have you edited under another account before ? Also please note that in the case you are being paid for your contributions, you must disclose that. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page etiquette

Hello, I have noticed you are posting the same messages again and again. Please stop doing that. It's unnecessary and disruptive. – NJD-DE (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sikander Ghuman (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sikander Ghuman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 19:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]