Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wazzup Carl (talk | contribs) at 15:03, 29 August 2022 (Midnights). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Reason: IP users are making unconstructive edits without making any consensus at talk page. Jeff6045 (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are lying now. You changed the political positions and ideologies that have been maintained for a long time in South Korean political parties yesterday without permission. I am urgently editing with data from my smartphone because the Wi-Fi machine at home is broken.--2001:2D8:6660:ABD6:B1F5:EEF7:62F6:C691 (talk) 05:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Permission??? Whose permission is required? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:49, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Translator error. There are a handful of sources that PPP is some source center-right, an overwhelming source of right-wing, and a rare far-right party. So the article has long designated the political position as "right-wing." It was Jeff6045 who caused an editorial war by changing it suddenly. The party has taken a completely unmoderate stance, including LGBT and feminism, and the recent backlash on disabled rights issues.--Mureungdowon (talk) 06:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm telling you, it's Jeff6045 who has changed his long-standing political position without permission, both in the Democratic Party and in the People Power Party. Check out the history of the two articles. So even though I proposed removing the political position from infobox in the People Power Party article Talk, Jeff6045 is deliberately ignoring it. In particular, in a Democratic Party of Korea article, Jeff6045 described Lee as "far-left." Naturally, Lee Jae-myung's extreme left is an incitement that is not identified as a reliable source. #--Mureungdowon (talk) 06:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, it's Jeff6045 who did vandalism about the article, but I'm misunderstood because I'm IP. Please check the history of the article and judge it objectively again. I am economically conservative and culturally progressive. Therefore, I personally dislike politicians like Lee Jae-myung, who are economically progressive and culturally conservative. But describing him as a "far-left" when he is neither a socialist nor an anti-capitalist is ridiculous, and source is not identified. The DPK is also a "left-wing" party, and no source is confirmed. The political position of the People Power Party article was also changed by Jeff6045.--Mureungdowon (talk) 07:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not call edits with which you disagree vandalism. Please discuss content and sourcing on talk page, seeking consensus for your preferred version. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:20, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Justificate (talk) 12:09, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 13:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by IP user and a couple of new accounts. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Looks like tag team vandalism. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing / vandalism. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and high level of disruptive editing BetsyRMadison (talk) 14:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.Wazzup Carl 14:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. For now I do see an increased amount of edits; what I do not see is much real vandalism so far. People just try to cram info into the article. Please relist if it gets worse. Lectonar (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand Lectonar, I will check when it gets worse. Thanks🤝