Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. V. Seetharamiah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

M. V. Seetharamiah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Been on the cat:nn list for 10+ years and never been updated. No secondary sourcing. Single obit is only ref. Couldn't located 2nd obit. No other coverage. Fr and ta wp's have exact same referencing. Fail WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 16:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and India. Shellwood (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: His WorldCat is pretty decent. WP:NAUTHOR may be able to be met with this person judging by the long career and large number of publications, so it's worth for someone to try and take a deeper dive to see if he meets any of the criteria. Curbon7 (talk) 02:09, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:46, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Curbon7: How are you? Editor User:Ktin is updating the article. scope_creep^Talk 08:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much. My edits are done. Life well lived. Good luck. Ktin (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after recent improvemenets to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Withdrawn Hi @Liz: I think the article has completed the WP:HEYMANN standard now with many decent references. It can be closed. scope_creep^Talk 09:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.