Jump to content

Purple prose

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anita5192 (talk | contribs) at 20:58, 6 September 2022 (Undid revision 1108882138 by Minoa (talk)Reverted good faith edit. This is not a good example of purple prose. It is an example of confusing writing style by way of verbosity, technical jargon, and a high level of diction. It may be better suited for one of those articles.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In literary criticism, purple prose is overly ornate prose text that may disrupt a narrative flow by drawing undesirable attention to its own extravagant style of writing, thereby diminishing the appreciation of the prose overall.[1] Purple prose is characterized by the excessive use of adjectives, adverbs, and metaphors. When it is limited to certain passages, they may be termed purple patches or purple passages, standing out from the rest of the work.

Purple prose is criticized for desaturating the meaning in an author's text by overusing melodramatic and fanciful descriptions. As there is no precise rule or absolute definition of what constitutes purple prose, deciding if a text, passage, or complete work has fallen victim is a somewhat subjective decision. According to Paul West, "It takes a certain amount of sass to speak up for prose that's rich, succulent and full of novelty. Purple is immoral, undemocratic and insincere; at best artsy, at worst the exterminating angel of depravity."[2]

Origins

The term purple prose is derived from a reference by the Roman poet Horace[3][4] (Quintus Horatius Flaccus, 65–8 BC) who wrote in his Ars Poetica (lines 14–21):[5]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ "A Word a Day – purple prose". Wordsmith.org. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  2. ^ West, Paul (15 December 1985). "In Defense of Purple Prose". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  3. ^ Nixon, Cheryl (2008). Novel Definitions. Broadview Press. pp. 194–. ISBN 978-1770482074. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  4. ^ Macrone, Michael (1994). It's Greek to Me. HarperCollins. pp. 147–. ISBN 978-0062720443. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  5. ^ Horace (18 BC). Ars Poetica. Lines 14–21.
  6. ^ Kline, A. S. (2005). "Horatti Flacci Ars Poetica – epistulae 3". Retrieved June 17, 2019.
  7. ^ Alternative translation:

    Your opening shows great promise, and yet flashy
    purple patches; as when describing
    a sacred grove, or the altar of Diana,
    or a stream meandering through fields,
    or the river Rhine, or a rainbow;
    but this was not the place for them. If you can realistically render
    a cypress tree, would you include one when commissioned to paint
    a sailor in the midst of a shipwreck?[original research?]

References

  • Coles Editorial Board, Dictionary of Literary Terms, Rama Brothers, 2001.