Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Reason: Edit war broken out, I pass no judgement at this stage on the issues involved, but could be worth halting this for a short period while issues are discussed on the talk page. PatGallacher (talk) 23:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Question: PatGallacher, is it resolved now with the IP's latest edit, do you think? El_C 00:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- There have been, at intervals up to just now, seven more edits, by three different people including the IP user, since you left that question. Largoplazo (talk) 11:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- There have been, at intervals up to just now, seven more edits, by three different people including the IP user, since you left that question. Largoplazo (talk) 11:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: For the same reason Chang Yi Wang was protected yesterday.. page history shows why -- GreenC 01:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Declined For the protection of talk-pages we need a higher level of disruption than for articles; disruption not big enough. Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal repeatedly removing content and occasionally adding false info. Squeakachu (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Declined Doesn't seem anywhere near as bad as the other one. Relist if they hop again. GedUK 09:04, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Verificado039095 (talk) 06:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits except from yourself and from citation bot since 23 August. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The disruptions and additions of unsourced content in the article have been going on for years now, with uninterrupted disruptive editing by IPs/new accounts in the last two years (see Talk and page hist). A perma semi is needed here as this is unlikely to abate as evidenced since the last PP expired. Gotitbro (talk) 08:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavy traffic and disruptive editing from IPs and fresh accounts. The Doom Patrol (talk) 08:57, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: The article was recently created, and surrounds a controversial subject. Reasonably persistent levels of low level vandalism, looking for semi-protection. Xx78900 (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: Try to prevent an edit war. Someone without an account adds their self-promotion to this article and when I delete that part, they revert my edits. I previously requested protection, and protection was granted for only 3 days. After that time ran out, my edit was reverted again by an IP. I request a much longer protection this time. Maltimore (talk) 11:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: High level of sockuppetry. Days after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Longsars was confirmed as a sock, the new account Investigator77 restored the same content 77wonders (talk) 11:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Reason: High level of sockuppetry. Days after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Longsars was confirmed as a sock, the new account Investigator77 restored the same content 77wonders (talk) 11:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- 77wonders is a sock or at least meat puppet of banned user:Iaaasi, because he has the very same favourit topics and editorial habits.--Investigator77 (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)