User talk:Cumbey

Wiki

Hello Constance. I am user David from the Solana fiansco on Global Elite wiki. I have been running my own wiki for 6 months now. It seems to be to your tastes. I would be greatftull for your contribution to it. The site is here. So far I have been the author of over 700 of the 842 articles we have at the moment. Almost all the others are contributions of a Wikipedia administrator. --Hierarchypedia 22:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I support what David is saying; hierarchypedia seems the place to put about Solana as the Beast theory; you can state exactly why you think he is the beast there. I don't think, on the other hand, that wikielite is the place to put forward such theories, any more than wikipedia is. It is clearly also the place where you can do original research. --SqueakBox 22:22, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)

There is

a dangerous character lurking on Wikipedia. He calls himself 'Squeakbox'. He commits unthinkable acts of vandalism. Besides utterly ruining the Javier Solana article, he maliciously vandalized, this my own page. Then he went in unseemly manner to the Solana page and accused ME of vandalizing his page! He defied me to use my user name and then started a malicious and legally actionable campaign of imputing many, many user ID numbers to me. He is obviously afraid to use his real name. He has jumped in many times while I was writing, making me unable to finish my page without receiving a message that "somebody else started editing this page while you were editing . . ." He made demands to me on his page demanding I answer him there. When I attempted to do so, he cried like a little kid kicking somebody in the knees and then calling for his mommy! A real gentleman and scholar, he. Maybe that is the name his mother gave him!

Squeakbox went over to Wiki Global Elite, an independent site using licensed Wiki Media technology and vandalized many pages, not only of myself, but erasing history pages, and then implying that an administrator there had done it and reporting on this board that his page had been locked in and the page composed by yours truly locked out. The administration of that board undid Squeakbox's damage and has locked the site from further unauthorized editing due to his vandalism! CONSTANCE E. CUMBEY cumbey@gmail.com

Squeakbox appears to be very much a sycophant for Javier Solana. He chops, he misspells, he uses poor grammar, and then to add insult to injury accuses those he abuses of his very acts. In psychological terms, it is called PROJECTION!" He claims on his page to have flunked logic. Now that, I could believe! User Cumbey.

SqueakBox

This is not your user page. This is your User Talk page. You did vandalise my user page, and someone else then reverted it because it was vandalism. i did not ruin the Solana article, i took the smell out of it. The smell of paranoid conspiracy theories. Conspiracy nuts are not welcome on this honourable project called Wikipedia. You reverted the Solana article to a factually inaccurate version after having been told it was factually inaccurate. The truth is Cumbey does not want the public to know that Solana is not the Devil, so she deliberately distorts and misrepresents Solana at every turn so that they can't get at the truth. I say the sooner we have a powerful EU the better. But I don't put this into my edits. If Honduras is the US patio they are doing a really bad job keeping it tidy. Honduras is floundering in poverty, and I am inclined to believe the Americans are responsible for this. --SqueakBox 04:20, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Spanish plea

Qué pasa mujer? No entendé nada del idioma de Javier, a qué no? Y así porqué no lo dejá en paz, y a mí también. Usted no sabé nada de el, ni le importa menos la verdad. Todos tenemos nuestras preocupaciones sobre los poderosos del mundo; yo no tengo mucha confianza en Condoleeza Rice tampoco, pero no la arruino la página.--SqueakBox 04:14, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living.

Constance E. Cumbey cumbey@gmail.com

Javier Solana

Cumbey, well I am glad we have one thing in common;dogs. I lost my 9 year old dog Boddhi 15 months ago, and it broke my heart. Even though in comparison Squeak and Box are untrained monsters Box is a very special being.

Are you aware that normally people who work here put their information on their user page, and keep the User talk page for discussion.

I have prejudices, as we all do, but I do not bring them into my work at wikipedia. I would urge you to read this about writing with a neutral viewpoint. Wikipedia is not a forum for people to express their opinions. It is an encyclopedia and therefore must remain impartial. Your changes to the Javier Solana article were obviously not coming from a neutral point of view, and have been reverted. Nobody cares re this article whether or not Solana is the Beast. It is a serious political article. If you want to document this 666 material you must do so at Number of the Beast (numerology) where they are interested in anything relating to the Beast and 666. Thanks for praying for me. Make sure it is a nice prayer. --SqueakBox 15:43, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

I have now put the document which I deleted, you reinserted and I redeleted from the Solana article into the Beast article. I have moved your bit about yourself to your User page User:Cumbey but if you don't want it there feel free to move it back here, or ask me to do so at User talk:SqueakBox. --SqueakBox 21:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)

Well, Squeabox, I read your 'rantings'/writings on end time theories with great interest. If you think those are funny, check out Findhorn, Plant Devas, Luciferic Initiations, Antahkaranas", Rainbow Bridges, etc., Doctrine of Avatars, and the whole plenitude of so publicly expressed New Age beliefs. Makes orthodox Christian doctrine look pretty tame, doesn't it, Squeakbox? Unfortunately, I don't have all day to sit at a computer and edit. I have to practice law for a living.

Constance E. Cumbey cumbey@gmail.com

3RR

There is a possible 3RR violation heading your way. Please see and comment to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. Thanks -- Chris 73 Talk 11:31, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)