Jump to content

Talk:Islamophobia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Egladfelter (talk | contribs) at 21:32, 24 September 2022 (Update Technical and Scientific Communication assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Nusrat Ghani's case

This item can probably used here. --Mhhossein talk 17:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a news item and also pending investigation so no its not for an encyclopaedia Robynthehode (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Robynthehode - Not necessarily. Keep in mind that lots of Wikipedia's content is made up of data from news reports. I do think that this could be a good addition to Islamophobia in the United Kingdom if not here. Dunutubble (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting inputs

Greetings,

Adequate and nuanced overview for even non– Muslim audience is expected out of the articles Muslims and Muslim world. Whether the articles are achieving that purpose adequately? Requesting and expecting proactive participation in providing inputs from non–Muslim audience too along with Muslim users.

Since the article Muslim world is tagged various improvements it can not be submitted to formal review process still I feel the article deserves more inputs for content improvement.

Requesting your visit to the articles

and provide your inputs @

Thanks

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 06:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is obviously patrolled by useful idiots

Not a useful discussion of article content improvement
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

If you actually look at google scholar, a lot of criticism is included in the academic debate of how nonsensical this term is. To summarise sources, it's a little like a bunch of hens being accused, every time a fox comes into their coop, of being "Foxophobic". Phil of rel (talk) 01:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As opposed to useless idiots who start threads here claiming that 'academic debate' exists, but don't provide either citations, or any indication as to what revisions to article content are actually being proposed? AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gee, you sure have a chip on your shoulder, AndytheGrump. You don't believe in magical sky wizards, do you? LOL Phil of rel (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, just look through scholar.google.com on the topic Islamophobia, like I talked about in my OP. I can see why there's a negative correlation between believing in a magical sky fairy and IQ from reading what you say. Phil of rel (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 200 Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aashima99 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Scientific Communication

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Agomezgarcia (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Egladfelter (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]