User talk:DeCausa

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Reverting Darin Treaty

Any reason ? Aziz bm (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, per edit summary. The territories you added aren't in the body of the article: per WP:LEAD, the information should already be in the article not new information. So naming those territories is unsourced. Also, because it's a short article, having a longer lead makes it very repetitive. Unless the article is expanded the lead should only be a sentence or two. Lastly, if you have issues with an editor's edit you should raise it on the article talk page first so that other interested editors can join in. DeCausa (talk) 07:09, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, last thing, saudi-iran relations, How did you concluded that Saudi is still conservative ? Aziz bm (talk) 07:11, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing your original posts after I've replied to them. I'm not going to reply to that or the other questions here. Post them on the relevant article talk page. DeCausa (talk) 07:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Aziz bm (talk) 07:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I see you've recently come off a long block for tendentious editing and moving pages without consensus. The edits of yours I reverted today are similar. DeCausa (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s why I’m starting to use talk page recently [1], I don’t want to get blocked again for the same reason Aziz bm (talk) 07:42, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Article

Once again User:Neplota is unnecessarily editing the Jesus article when the topic has been discussed extensively at Talk:Jesus/Archive 134. Once again thank you for your help in reverting but I am just letting you know that I expect this to continue as I have even warned the user yet they continue to edit without consensus. Thank you. Thebighomie123 (talk) 13:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for all your thoughtful and helpful advice about the AN stuff, much appreciated, and I really mean that. But I also have a request, just a request, not a requirement. Please consider deleting "Step away, indeed." The comment works fine without it, and I expect that that last sentence will be used against me. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. DeCausa (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I think you mean "List of rulers in Wales"? Peter Ormond 💬 21:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. DeCausa (talk) 21:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Note

Good Morning @DeCausa

someone recently made edits on both Saudi Arabia and Flag of Saudi Arabia, placing the main flag as variant while the other as main, I request your kind consideration to revert the edits as the flag is currently on a dispute situation and there's ongoing discussion over this issue on Wikimedia talk page which means any edits may affect the process.

Kind Regards 91.25.189.139 (talk) 09:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The RFC can be found here. Your input would be appreciated! HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 18:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HapHaxion: thanks. I'm not really familiar with Commons policies and don't really participate there. The thread at Talk:Saudi Arabia is independent of any discussion or consensus at Commons and it's here that any binding decision on what flag should be used for the KSA article at en.wp will be made rather than at Commons. You're welcome to take anything I say there to Commons if you think it's of any use. DeCausa (talk) 02:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mozart

I have no intention to enter any infobox discussion, but keep watching. What I saw in 2021 was Ian Fleming and Stanley Kubrick, with the closure of Fleming much to my liking. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

George VI, Elizabeth II & Charles III

Howdy. I don't like having "Head of the Commonwealth" at the top of Charles III's infobox, anymore then you do. But that was the RFC result of George VI & Elizabeth II. PS - If you want to open another RFC on that topic, I wouldn't object. GoodDay (talk) 22:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reign of Elizabeth II

AfD with pleasure, but please finish the job. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give us a chance! In the middle of doing it. I hate impenetrable WP processes!!!! DeCausa (talk) 21:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now done. DeCausa (talk) 21:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Might I suggest the use of Twinkle? All becomes simple then.

I respect your choice to nominate it for deletion. I've left a comment at the discussion and will remain neutral 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In 12 years I think I've probably nominated for deletion 3 times. When you do something regularly on WP it's all fine but as soon as you don't it feels like you have to spend a whole evening to work it all out. I never understand why everything has to be so clunky. Take the point on Twinkle - will remember to look at it when I do it next time...in 3 years. DeCausa (talk) 21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manual AfD is a swine!

I do commend to you nominating poor material for deletion. We have more rubbish than you can shake a stick at. A challenge when you do very few is getting the rationale right, but that ought never to matter, because others will likely propose further additions to it

This one's rationale looks fine to me. Watching and waiting will be fun. I genuinely have no opinion either way. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this

stop this. You've been told multiple times

You wrote this. This is not true. Please provide diffs of your claim.

On the other hand, you reverted without talk page discussion. Please do not do this. It is wrong and hostile. CandyStalnak (talk) 19:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]