User talk:Aspiringchemistyht

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rainbow into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Drillia diasi have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Drillia diasi was changed by Aspiringchemistyht (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889109 on 2022-09-18T01:07:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drillia diasi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 01:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Mako001

Hello, Aspiringchemistyht. You have new messages at Mako001's talk page.
Message added 04:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 04:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thx Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 00:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Exotic star. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. a!rado (C✙T) 12:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Color theory. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See MOS:ENGVAR. a!rado (C✙T) 12:23, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what commentary did i add? Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 02:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 03:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Aspiringchemistyht (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what disruptive edits did i make please give example Aspiringchemistyht (talk) 03:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=what disruptive edits did i make please give example [[User:Aspiringchemistyht|Aspiringchemistyht]] ([[User talk:Aspiringchemistyht#top|talk]]) 03:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=what disruptive edits did i make please give example [[User:Aspiringchemistyht|Aspiringchemistyht]] ([[User talk:Aspiringchemistyht#top|talk]]) 03:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=what disruptive edits did i make please give example [[User:Aspiringchemistyht|Aspiringchemistyht]] ([[User talk:Aspiringchemistyht#top|talk]]) 03:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}