User talk:Paul Barlow

This Wikipedian is deceased. Respectful comments of remembrance may be left below.

This user is a 'Bretagnophile'.

User talk:Paul Barlow/Archive1
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 2
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 3
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 4
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 5
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 6
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 7
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 8
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 9
user talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 10
User talk:Paul Barlow/Archive 11

Condolence

God rest his soul. Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 20:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Condolences to his family. I am still stunned. I will miss Paul. Tom Reedy (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Deb (talk) 05:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Truly sad news. Condolences to his family. I'll so miss "Paul B" in Talk pages and edit summaries. Xover (talk) 21:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another 'quick bright one' devoured. Sit tibi terra levis. Nishidani (talk) 16:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really sad to hear about Paul's death. Wiki's "virtual reality" suddenly gets very real and personal. Just gone, like a button being switched-off. Farewell, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:50, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A tragedy. Condolences and thoughts to all those he left behind. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:31, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just noticed this. Yes, quite a shock. It was a pleasure working with you, Paul. You will be missed. So much for the idea that Wikipedia is not "real life". --Alan W (talk) 06:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Paul's excellent work is seen by many, and Paul will be missed. Johnuniq (talk) 07:23, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just seen this. Terribly sad news. One of the best editors there was, fearless, patient, honest and with a vast range and depth of knowledge. RIP. --Folantin (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also just seen. What a shock. RIP and condolences to his family. Who will now man the battlements of Shakespeare authorship articles? Johnbod (talk) 00:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And I also just discovered this. I can't put it better than Folantin did. A shock. Doug Weller (talk) 13:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Paul was astute, knowledgeable, helpful, very well regarded and liked, and is a huge loss. My sympathy to family and friends. Ceoil (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw this; a fine editor who will be missed. Condolences to his family. Kierzek (talk) 15:47, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very sorry to see this. May your many thousands of quality edits remain as your memorial. ‑‑Yodin^T 00:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no! I only just discovered this, as I noticed his signature on the talk page for Orpheus and wondered why I hadn't come across his comments lately, worrying that he had quit Wikipedia. My sympathies to all those who were personally close to him. As a beacon and consistent, reliable source of sanity and competence when POV warriors turn up, he will be sorely missed; to me, his sig was a trademark, and always reassuring. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Paul, thank you for all your excellent work. Rest in peace. SteveStrummer (talk) 21:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've just heard this sad news. We got up each other's noses a little about the true identity of William Shakespeare, but that's all part of the rough and tumble of intellectual discourse. It was never personal from either of us. Vale, Paul. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 23:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just using the "Who Wrote That?" tool and wondering who it was that had the good taste to add this image to the article on "Abstract art". I'm sorry to hear about his passing. Bus stop (talk) 21:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Obituary and other memorials

Obituary: Dr Paul Barlow

		The Million Award
		This is unfortunately posthumously conferred. Paul's contribution in bringing the William Shakespeare (estimated annual readership: 4,550,000) to Featured Article status was indispensable, and therefore I think it due, in order to express our deep appreciation for his seminal input in what has become a widely read article of the highest quality, that we register here his earned right to the Million Award, as a token of the influence his labour in the wiki fields will exercise on a global readership. Nishidani (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AryRenan.jpg

The file File:AryRenan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused scaled-down duplicate of File:Jeune fille contemplant un crâne. Ary Renan.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Circassian girl.jpg

The file File:Circassian girl.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Low quality. Superseded by File:Gérôme--Femme circassienne voilée--Veiled Circassian Beauty--1876.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Castagnodetail.jpg

The file File:Castagnodetail.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality. Replaceable with File:Andrea del castagno, cenacolo di sant'apollonia, 1447, 07.JPG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:24, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

""Third Folio"" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect "Third Folio" and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 17#"Third Folio" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 14:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]